directorynearshoringsupply chain

Directory: Nearshore AI Workforce Providers for Logistics and Supply Chain Teams

oorganiser

2026-01-26

9 min read

Up-to-date directory of AI-augmented nearshore teams for logistics: quick vendor profiles, pricing models and 30–90 day integration playbooks for 2026.

Hook: Why headcount-based nearshoring is failing logistics teams in 2026

Operations leaders tell the same story in 2025–26: nearshore teams helped cut costs, but as freight volatility, SKU complexity and e-commerce returns grew, simply adding people stopped moving the needle. Fragmented systems, inconsistent processes and manual event-handling created hidden overhead that negated labor savings. The immediate, practical answer many teams are buying into now is AI-augmented nearshore workforces — nearshore talent combined with purpose-built AI to raise throughput, reduce rework and make outcomes predictable.

Why this directory matters in 2026

Late 2025 saw a wave of new entrants positioning nearshore operations around intelligence rather than only arbitrage. FreightWaves covered one of these launches — MySavant.ai — underscoring a shift: nearshore models that succeed now embed AI into the core operating model, not bolt it on. This directory gives logistics and supply chain teams a fast way to scan providers by capabilities, pricing models and integration playbooks so you can short-list partners, run pilots and capture ROI faster.

How to read these profiles

Each profile below is a quick-read snapshot: what they do best, typical pricing models you'll encounter, integration playbook outline you can reuse, and the operational risks to mitigate. Use the profiles to create a 30–90 day pilot plan and an objective scoring rubric for selection.

Provider profiles (quick-read)

1) MySavant.ai — AI-first nearshore teams for logistics (not a classic BPO)

Why they stand out: Launched in late 2025, MySavant.ai was built by logistics operators who saw traditional nearshore scaling break down. They position themselves as an AI-augmented operations partner — combining nearshore talent with workflow AI, RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) for knowledge access, and agent orchestration to reduce manual triage.

Core capabilities:

Automated document ingestion and classification (BOLs, PODs, invoices)
AI-assisted exceptions handling (claims, claims adjudication, carrier disputes)
Workflow orchestration linking TMS, WMS and collaboration tools
Nearshore bilingual teams trained to operate AI copilots

Pricing models: Hybrid — baseline subscription for platform/AI tooling + FTE-equivalent seats for operator oversight. Expect three tiers: pilot (month-to-month small seat), scale (annual, committed volume) and outcomes (shared savings or per-resolution fee).

Integration playbook (90 days):

Week 0–2: Data mapping and connector deployment to TMS/WMS/ERP
Week 3–4: Pilot cohort of 5–10 nearshore agents with AI copilots
Week 5–8: KPI baseline comparison (manual vs AI-augmented)
Week 9–12: Scale playbook and SLA definitions, governance handover

Risks & mitigations: Data access governance (use least-privilege connectors), model hallucination on rare contracts (inject human review on low-confidence cases), and change management for onshore teams.

“We’ve seen nearshoring work — and we’ve seen where it breaks,” said Hunter Bell, founder and CEO of MySavant.ai — a useful mantra for vetting vendors in 2026.

2) Savant International — BPO with a platform-forward spin

Why they stand out: Savant has deep BPO heritage and has evolved several teams into AI-augmented centers. Best for teams that need full-process outsourcing with phased AI adoption (document automation first, agent copilots second).

Core capabilities:

End-to-end freight operations support
Document digitization + ML classification pipelines
Regional hubs in Latin America with bilingual staff

Pricing models: Traditional per-FTE BPO tiers, plus an optional technology surcharge for AI modules. Expect blended rates with discounts for multi-year contracts.

Integration playbook (60–120 days):

Discovery and SLA drafting
Pilot process handover and knowledge capture
Rollout of ML models for high-volume tasks
Embedded continuous improvement with quarterly reviews

3) Platform-led nearshore marketplaces (examples: staffing + embedded AI)

Why they stand out: These platforms let you rent nearshore AI talent by the seat or task and connect to cloud tools via pre-built connectors. Useful for short-term seasonal surges or experimenting with AI agents without a long SOW.

Core capabilities:

Rapid onboarding (48–72 hours)
Pre-trained copilots for common logistics workflows
Flexible seat-based billing

Pricing models: Hourly or monthly seat fees; premium for custom model tuning. Volume discounts for ongoing seats.

Integration playbook: Fast — connector install, 1-week micro-pilot, runbook handoff.

4) Boutique AI consultancies + nearshore squads

Why they stand out: Smaller teams that build custom ML pipelines and embed nearshore operators to run them. Best when you need differentiated AI capabilities (demand forecasting, inventory optimization) with hands-on integration.

Core capabilities:

Custom ML models for forecasting, allocation and route optimization
Embedded nearshore squad for model monitoring and human-in-the-loop

Pricing models: Project-based + retainer for ongoing ops. Higher upfront engineering cost, lower marginal cost for scale.

5) Regional hubs & talent collectives (country-focused)

Why they stand out: These providers exploit low churn and timezone alignment in hubs like Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico and Argentina. They often pair labor with local data ops and compliance services.

Pricing models: FTE or managed services, typically lower than onshore equivalent but higher than offshore Asia for senior AI specialists.

Pricing models you will see in 2026 — and how to choose

By 2026 three pricing structures dominate:

FTE-equivalent: Traditional seat pricing. Easiest for budget predictability but may not incentivize productivity gains.
Platform subscription + seat: You pay for the AI platform (licence) plus operator seats. Best if you want vendor-managed tooling with predictable run-costs.
Outcome-based / shared savings: Vendor charges a portion of realized savings (lower detention costs, fewer claims). High alignment but requires clear baseline KPIs and auditability.

Choosing guidance:

Use FTE pricing for controlled pilots with known scope.
Use subscription + seat for multi-process automation where tooling matters.
Use outcome-based for mature processes with measurable dollar outcomes and trusted partners.

Integration playbook — repeatable steps to get live in 90 days

Below is a practical, battle-tested playbook you can adapt as an SOW annex. It reflects 2025–26 best practices used by leading nearshore AI providers.

Define intent and KPIs (Days 0–7)
- Pick 1–2 processes (e.g., claims adjudication, PO exception handling)
- Set KPIs: throughput, AHT (average handle time), error rate, cost-per-resolution
Data and security onboarding (Days 7–21)
- Least-privilege connectors to TMS/WMS/ERP
- Encryption at rest and in transit, SOC2 or equivalent attestation
Pilot build (Days 21–45)
- Deploy models (document OCR, NER, classification)
- Embed retrieval systems with company knowledge bases
Human-in-the-loop training (Days 45–60)
- Train nearshore agents on AI copilots and exception checklists
- Define escalation rules for low-confidence outcomes
Measure & iterate (Days 60–90)
- Run A/B comparisons vs baseline
- Refine prompts, thresholds and retraining cadence
Scale & govern (Post-90)
- Formalize SLAs, quality gates and audit trails
- Set quarterly business reviews and savings sharing if agreed

Checklist for vendor evaluation (use in RFP/RFI)

Copy this checklist into your RFP to cut vendor shortlisting time.

Do you provide AI tooling AND managed nearshore teams? (Yes/No)
Can you operate within our timezones and language needs?
Do you have connectors to our TMS/WMS/ERP or a plan to build them in under 14 days?
What is your baseline data security posture? (SOC2, ISO27001, local regulations)
Can you supply a 30–90 day pilot SOW with measurable KPIs and pricing?
What is the escalation matrix and human-in-the-loop policy for AI low-confidence outputs?
Do you provide model explainability or audit logs for regulatory needs?

KPIs & SLA templates (practical examples)

Use these operational metrics to hold vendors accountable:

Throughput: # of exceptions handled per agent per shift
Accuracy: % correct classification/decision after 2-day review
Time-to-resolution: median hours from ticket open to close
Escalation rate: % cases flagged for onshore escalation
Cost-per-resolution: total vendor charge divided by resolved cases

Operational risks and 2026 compliance guardrails

The AI and data landscape changed rapidly through 2025. In 2026 you must validate:

Data sovereignty: Where data is stored and processed. Nearshore hubs often provide regional guarantees which matters for cross-border PII.
Model governance: Retraining cadence, version control, and audit logs for decision trails.
Human oversight: Clear rules for agent override and review thresholds for low-confidence AI outputs.
Bias & fairness: For automated decisions affecting carriers, customers or procurement, check for systemic biases.

Case snapshots — what success looks like

These anonymized snapshots reflect common early outcomes seen in 2025 pilots.

Snapshot A: Claims adjudication — 60 day pilot

Baseline: 40 claims/day; 18% rework; 48-hour average resolution
Pilot: AI copilots + nearshore team handled 80 claims/day with 7% rework and average resolution 18 hours
Outcome: 30% cost reduction per claim and 25% faster settlement

Snapshot B: Carrier invoicing reconciliation

Baseline: Manual match rate 72%; month-end backlog
Pilot: ML document extraction + nearshore verification improved match rate to 95% and eliminated backlog
Outcome: Reduced late-payment fees and improved carrier relationships

Future trends to watch (2026–2028)

Expect these shifts to shape nearshore AI partnerships:

Agent orchestration marketplaces: Vendors will offer plug-and-play agent libraries for logistics-specific tasks. See the trade-offs when you buy vs build micro‑apps.
Outcome-linked contracting: More contracts will include shared-savings and risk-sharing clauses.
Federated learning models: To protect data sovereignty while improving models across customers; consider how to monetize or govern training data.
Low-code orchestration: Onshore teams will be able to design workflows without heavy engineering input — that choice often maps to the same buy/build decision as micro-apps (guide).

Quick takeaways — what to do this quarter

Run a focused 30–60 day pilot on one high-volume exception process.
Insist on human-in-the-loop and clear escalation thresholds from day one.
Compare at least two pricing models: seat-based and outcome-based, with a preference to blend them.
Verify SOC2/ISO27001 and regional data processing locations before signing an MSA.

How organiser.info helps

We curate vendor profiles, post verified pilot playbooks and provide a templated RFP you can reuse. If you want a short-list tailored to your region (Mexico vs Colombia vs Costa Rica) and process (claims vs invoicing vs forecasting), our team matches you with 3 vetted providers and a 30-day pilot SOW template.

Call to action

Ready to move beyond headcount and towards predictable outcomes? Download our 90-day pilot SOW template and vendor scorecard, or request a free matchmaking call. Click to get your tailored shortlist and an implementation playbook you can run this quarter.

organiser

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.